You're sitting in a planning meeting. You ask: "How many requests were processed?"
Manager: "All that came in. Worked without a break."
You look at the report: 230 inquiries. 140 responses. 90 left hanging.
You think: "He's lying!"
No. He's not lying.
The problem is deeper. The problem is how human perception works.
When a manager answers 10 messages in a row, they get the feeling: "I've been answering all day long." The brain registers activity. The brain remembers fatigue.
But what about a message that came in while they were on a call? Their brain didn't register it. Because there was no contact.
A message that came in at 7:15 PM when they were already driving home? It doesn't exist in their reality.
The manager works with what they see. The invisible doesn't count.
This isn't about irresponsibility. It's about how attention works.
You can demand "process everything." But if the tracking system relies on the employee's memory, losses are inevitable.
The manager sincerely believes they did everything possible. And they're right—they did everything they COULD SEE.
And then there's the math: if a person only sees what they've reached, how do they know what they missed?
The report shows 40% leakage. The manager is surprised: "Where from?!"
Here's where: from blind spots.
Attention span is limited. Memory is selective. The brain protects itself from overload by erasing what it didn't process.
And as long as you build a system on human memory, you'll have that 40%.
The solution isn't to force people to be robots. The solution is to remove from the process what requires a robot—recording every inquiry, instant response, full transparency.
When the first line is automated, the manager sees the full picture. Not just what they reached, but everything. Because the system forgets nothing.
Your people are not enemies. They're just people. With all the limitations of the brain.
The question: will you build your business on these limitations or remove them from critical points?
Comments
0No comments yet.
Sign in to join the discussion.