A review is a boring format. It's understandable, it's predictable. But it's in demand because people are interested in learning about a movie/series/game/anime/book before watching/playing/reading, or to compare their feelings after experiencing the work, or to find some missed meanings. That's why it will always exist.

But!

No one forbids experimenting with form and format. Perhaps, as a person who has been writing film texts for more than 15 years, this is more interesting to me than to readers, but lately I've decided that I can try to give people something more.

For example, at the end of last year, I wrote a review of the series "One of Many" from the perspective of the collective mind that operated in the project.

Now I've decided to apply the format of pseudo gonzo journalism to a review of the series "Wonder Man", which itself exploits the meta-level (inside the series there are Ryan Murphy, Stephen King, and "Twilight").

Since "Wonder Man" is an obvious satire of the film industry, a review in the style of a "report from Hollywood," in my opinion, organically resonates with the theme. This gave me, as the author, the opportunity to show that the series is not so much about superheroes as about people trying to survive in the dream industry.