Beginners (unfortunately, sometimes not only them) in film texts (reviews, collections) confuse input data (director, genre, year) with theme and meanings. As a result, half (if not more) of the review is “the film was released in 2023, directed by so-and-so, starring...”. And to the question “What is the film about?” – there is no clear answer.
For example, compare two sentences:
– A 1977 romantic comedy where Woody Allen plays a neurotic who meets a girl.
– This is a film about the fact that love is not about “living happily ever after”, but about the moments you remember even when it's all over.
See the difference? The second one is no longer Wikipedia, but an author's thought.
Give the film's input data in micro proportions (believe me, many readers may not care about the names and biographies of cinematographers at all), or if they serve your idea (for example: “this is the debut of such and such a director, therefore...”).
After you write the text, check yourself: remove the director's name, release year, synopsis and other “statistical” data from the material and evaluate the quality of the article. If the meaning hasn't suffered – it's fine, you wrote about the film, not provided a reference about it, of which there are plenty on the internet without your text.
#СоветыРедактора@the_rrated
Comments
0No comments yet.
Sign in to join the discussion.