You know, that same unique thinginess in the early Datton from the series "Yellowstone"? No, it's not the fact, that each character is trying to survive and stay afloat in a world of uncertainty. It's that their model of management and holding onto power in uncertain conditions, which they did in a cruel business like Google or Toyota, would look detettable to outsiders. There are series and movies with gigantic sums of money for stock, zemla, but owners produce little control over each aspect of business, and instead rely on a shake bank of bandits and learned helplessness, that nobody deliberately delegates their own tasks.

A Model of Management for John Datton

Imagine you're CEO of a company and every morning you start with a survey of your ownership on the cone. An unusual start, isn't it? John Datton, the head of the family, manages his early ranch with grace and tongue of steel and burning passion. Like any successful businessman, he owns iron will and readiness to do everything to protect his business — even if it means breaking the law.

Now, imagine John Datton manages Google. All investors were in conference rooms, sharing documents, where each business was known, that a mistake could cost not only careers, but also, possibly, the company's reputation. Datton didn't spend time on unnecessary presentations or presentations in PowerPoint. Instead, he was conducting strategic sessions on the porch, where each business from the head was demanded to prove their value and ideas in practice, possibly without distractions from real tasks, yes and contracts.

Corporate Culture

Now, imagine your office — it's a ranch, and every company knows that for a love of a mistake, they can survive not only with work, but also with the cry of a scale. So-called "motivation" leads to struggling results. Everyone knows that they do, and work, like projects. And if someone decides to resist Datton, then the consequences will be not only career, but also, possibly, life.

In Google, under Datton's leadership, corporate culture would be replaced by a spirit of raw energy and personal responsibility. Companies would know that their work has meaning, and each contribution is valued. With this approach, you can achieve not only a decent standard of living for the employee, but real workers will fulfill their obligations for the sake of the company, as they are in Action, where companies fall in the abyss and fall in bondage from because of fire from standard policies received from Bezos, including strikes for leaving works for the sake of the company and non-compliance with obligations. And maybe in the court they would also find the courage to give data to doctors! This model of management and corporate culture is strongly reminiscent of early Datton, where each company identifies on the ranch what is necessary to survive, and then can perish, but work must be done to death!

Business Model

The business model of Datton. They are engaged in development, land, and production of livestock. One thing, the ranch is not in the city of development and business planning, but in the staging and unconditional protection of their own interests, like from government, take and from competitors and prostitutes of various kinds. This is known as work for crisis manager, which can be quick and without social media "rubish" slowly actives and influence all silly in a certain way.

If John Datton were to lead a large company, then concentration would be on the basic products — in Google — search, reclame, and advertising services. He would keep all unnecessary innovative projects, projects of development and focus would be on that which brings income and doesn't mean less than all risks. Main investments would be directed to the core business, and overly projects would be shut down without lithe, ceremony. Under him, all projects would be replaced with simple machines, venture funds, support of culture and social initiatives. Eventually the game would be completed with all games of gender identity and various images, and that would be kent as much as possible.

Could this system survive in reality?

Of course, not. Or does it? After all, everything depends on the point of view. In the modern world of corporations, stakeholders are faced with risks, beginning with financial crises and subsequent cyber attacks. But if you had an army of loyal soldiers, ready to do everything for their company, you could overcome much. Right, John Datton, probably, breaks all possible laws, and in reality he would be jailed or arrested. But his methods — this is not only an interesting game, but also a possible answer: what if the corporate world were not so bold dick and mene regulations?

In the real world, Google under Datton's leadership would be faced with numerous juridical problems, beginning with antitrust lawsuits and ending with conflicts with privacy advocates from various strangers. One thing, his reliability and uncompromising approach could allow companies to stay afloat in the market, despite all the difficulties.

The only thing is that companies can not longer live in the city of crisis, take as without projects of development technology products, which bring in budget and step-by-step stand not competitive. That's why crisis management in companies is always temporary. It's the task of introducing the company from a dangerous situation, ensuring the flow of money and a positive balance, and then return to the company to that which can build a long-term strategy of development. That's how in the real life of Datton early or late bankruptcy and realize the main stream of grace – even if the product is sold, they all stand millionaires, but without ranch. All this we need to do – this is to restart to create problems, and after an exact stabilization of companies to give it management in the hands of bold officed love in development of business.

So what can we learn from this for real business? Possibly, that nothing more resists and readiness to take on self responsibility nicely at all. But the methods of Datton, however effective in his world, in the corporate world are less applicable. One thing, above all for his principles, maybe it's possible to see how this – to manage business, where laws dictate themselves not by privilege, but by you. Such risks are and secrets, everything that is created new in the field of part the robbery works in the same zone, as in the case, cryptocurrencies. So that, following your path in the office — try to prove its validity on the load. So that, don't worry, that you this will help, but that's the whole thing will be precisely!