Starting in July, mandatory exchange of TIN between banks for transfers is introduced in the fast payment system, and at first glance this seems like an unnoticeable change for users. The information space is actively promoting the thesis: "every transfer is now controlled through TIN". The wording is simplified, but the trend itself is much deeper and more systemic. This is not about a one-time tightening, but about a gradual transition to a model where transactions are analyzed not individually, but in conjunction with other data.

⚙️ What is being introduced from July 2026

Banks begin transmitting the TIN of the sender and recipient within the SBP. The client does not see this: there is no need to enter the TIN, the transfer scenario does not change. For the user, the interface remains the same; changes occur at the level of banking infrastructure and data exchange. But inside the system, a new link appears: phone → account → TIN → transaction history.

This link allows matching transfers between different banks and forming a unified picture of fund movements. Previously, a transfer by phone number was perceived as a separate action. Now it is part of a single financial profile. It is this profile that is subsequently used to assess risks and identify atypical behavior.

🧬 Why TIN specifically

TIN cannot be replaced like a card or phone number. It is a stable identifier that allows the system to combine transactions even when details change. Even if a client uses different banks or changes numbers, the link through TIN is preserved. In effect, a model is created where user behavior becomes more transparent for analysis. This simplifies the detection of schemes with "smearing" payments and using fake details.

🔄 What really changes

The key shift is not in the transfer itself, but in the approach to control. The logic of evaluating transactions changes, not the transfer mechanism itself. Previously, an individual transaction was analyzed; now the entire structure of receipts is assessed.

It is the totality of transactions that begins to play a decisive role. The system sees not only the fact of the transfer, but also:
• regularity
• number of senders
• repeatability of amounts
• overall flow of money


Additionally, the periodicity of receipts and their behavior over time may be taken into account. And it begins to look not for a transfer, but for the economic meaning of transactions. That is, it analyzes whether the nature of receipts corresponds to the real income model.

⚠️ Where the risk arises

Attention falls on situations where there are signs of systematic income: these are not isolated cases, but rather recurring behavior patterns.
• regular receipts to the card
• transfers from different individuals
• money for services without formalization
• rent and regular payments


Also, scenarios where there is no logical connection between the source of income and the recipient's status may attract attention. In such cases, the question will be different: why is this flow of money not reflected in the tax model. And it is this question that becomes the starting point for further inquiries or checks.

📌 What is important not to confuse

It is important not to go to extremes: many formulations in the information space distort the real essence of the changes.
• no need to manually enter TIN
• total control of all transfers does not appear
• one-time transactions are not the target of the system


Control does not become continuous; it remains risk-oriented. As transactions accumulate, a digital income model is formed: the more stable and regular the flow, the higher the probability of its analysis. The object of assessment is not an individual payment, but the entire logic of financial behavior.

🎯 Key conclusion

In short:
• it's not the transfer itself that matters, but its regularity
• risk arises not in the payment, but in the structure of the money flow


In essence, transfers by phone number cease to be a neutral form of payment. Their significance is already determined not by the method of transfer, but by the context in which they are used. In the current model, such transactions are integrated into the system of income analysis and financial behavior and become part of the overall picture seen by banks and regulators.

📲 Join us on MAX