I read several articles in a row about wellbeing strategies in the global corporate world. It's about creating an environment where a person feels physically healthy, emotionally stable, socially protected, and professionally fulfilled. In 2026, this approach is gaining new momentum and expanding beyond the corporate focus to the personal one. Remember how the strategy of overachievement has been strengthening over the past 10 years? I clearly remember the position: if you work in one place for more than 3 years, you are not developing. That means in another year you will be unwanted. Now, 'Faster, higher, stronger' is gradually transforming into a new approach, where it matters how the employee feels in all the above areas.

I work in a company where voluntary health insurance, gyms in offices, a psychologist hotline, and a financial consultant are already a given. And I see great value in such benefits from the company and understand how they affect the comfort of life. But I also see within teams employees who, contrary to the corporate wellbeing approach, disrupt their own balance, not knowing the value of their physical resources, for example. It's clear that if you don't sleep at night, it's hard to stay productive. Or constantly violating the boundary between work and personal life is a path to burnout.

It seems to me that such a transformation should come from both sides. No corporation can 'force' an employee to be rested and happy if they do not observe basic life 'hygiene' on their part. And here we return to the once fashionable wheel of balance:) And check how evenly distributed the satisfaction from each area of life is. Even an ultra-cool company with all the bonuses and perks cannot compensate for the lack of personal hobbies, quality communication with people outside of work, and good physical condition. What do you think?

#reflections